Exchange rates and BoP adjustment
Current account dynamics.
Floating exchange rate as automatic adjustment.
Under a floating regime, the exchange rate acts as a self-correcting mechanism for BoP imbalances:
- Current account deficit → demand for foreign currency rises (to pay for imports) → domestic currency depreciates.
- Depreciation → imports more expensive (volumes fall), exports cheaper (volumes rise) → CA improves toward balance.
In theory, this means floating rates eliminate persistent imbalances. In practice:
- Capital flows DOMINATE many currency markets in the short run.
- Imbalances can persist for years (USA's CA deficit).
Marshall-Lerner condition. Depreciation improves the current account IF:
If the sum of (absolute) elasticities of demand for exports and imports exceeds 1.
Why? Depreciation affects CA through:
- Export VALUES (price falls in foreign currency, but quantity rises if elastic).
- Import VALUES (price rises in domestic currency, but quantity falls if elastic).
If demand is inelastic (necessities), depreciation may WORSEN the CA — higher import prices outweigh export volume gains.
Worked example.
- |PEDexports| = 0.4, |PEDimports| = 0.5. Sum = 0.9 < 1. Marshall-Lerner FAILS. Depreciation WORSENS CA.
- |PEDexports| = 1.2, |PEDimports| = 0.8. Sum = 2.0 > 1. Marshall-Lerner HOLDS. Depreciation IMPROVES CA.
J-curve effect. Even when Marshall-Lerner is satisfied, the CA initially WORSENS after depreciation before improving:
Why?
- CONTRACTS pre-set in foreign currency: imports immediately cost more in domestic currency; exports earn the agreed foreign amount.
- Trade VOLUMES are sticky: consumers/buyers don't immediately switch suppliers.
- So PRICE EFFECT dominates initially.
Over time:
- Volumes adjust as consumers find alternatives.
- New contracts negotiated at adjusted prices.
- Export volumes rise; import volumes fall.
- CA improves.
The path traces a J-shape: down before up.
Financial account effects of depreciation:
- Expected further depreciation → capital outflow → currency falls further.
- Higher interest rates to defend currency (if floating but managed) → capital inflows.
- Foreign-currency debt becomes harder to service in domestic terms → could trigger default in emerging markets.
Capital flows can dominate. Modern currency markets are driven more by financial flows than trade flows:
- Daily FX turnover ~$7.5 trillion (BIS 2022).
- Annual world trade ~$30 trillion.
- So FX volume in 4 days = world trade in a year.
This means small interest rate changes or shifts in confidence can move currencies dramatically — disconnected from trade fundamentals.
Fixed exchange rate adjustment (contrast). Under a fixed regime, CA imbalances DON'T trigger exchange rate change. Instead:
- Reserves change.
- Domestic price adjustment ("internal devaluation").
- Capital controls may be needed.
If imbalance persists, devaluation eventually forced (1992 sterling crisis, 1997 Asian crisis).
HL Paper 3 application. Calculate Marshall-Lerner condition from PED data; assess whether depreciation improves CA; trace J-curve effects on numerical data.
- Floating rate = automatic CA adjustment.
- Marshall-Lerner: PEDx + PEDm > 1 for improvement.
- J-curve: short-run worsening before improvement.
- Capital flows dominate FX in short run.
- Fixed regimes accumulate imbalances.