Asymmetric information β adverse selection and moral hazard
When one side knows more.
Asymmetric information = transaction in which one party has BETTER information than the other.
Two main consequences:
Adverse selection β occurs BEFORE the transaction. The party with WORSE expected outcomes is MORE LIKELY to engage in the transaction, driving good types out.
Akerlof's "Market for Lemons" (1970) β classic example. In a used car market:
- Buyers can't tell good cars from "lemons" (bad cars).
- Sellers of good cars know they're good; would want fair price.
- Sellers of lemons happily sell at the average price.
- Buyers, expecting some lemons in the pool, only offer the average-quality price.
- Good-car sellers withdraw; only lemons remain.
- Market UNRAVELS β good cars don't trade.
Insurance adverse selection. Healthcare plans face this:
- People who know they have health problems are MORE likely to buy comprehensive coverage.
- Healthy people opt out.
- Insurer's pool becomes high-risk β premiums rise β more healthy people opt out.
- Death spiral if uncorrected.
Moral hazard β occurs AFTER the transaction. The insured party takes MORE risk than they would without insurance because the cost is borne by the insurer.
Examples:
- Car insurance: drivers drive less carefully if fully insured.
- Health insurance: patients seek more treatment than necessary if all costs covered.
- Banking: banks take more risks if they expect bailout ("too big to fail").
- Mortgage market: securitisation in 2000s reduced banks' incentive to vet borrowers carefully β 2008 crisis.
Private solutions:
Signalling. Party with better info CREDIBLY transmits it to the other side.
- Warranties signal product quality.
- Educational degrees signal worker ability (Spence's model β labour market).
- Audited financial statements signal firm health.
For signalling to work, the signal must be COSTLIER for "bad types" to fake.
Screening. Party with WORSE info extracts info from the other.
- Insurance companies offer MULTIPLE plans β high-coverage with low deductible vs low-coverage with high deductible. High-risk customers choose comprehensive; low-risk choose minimal.
- Job interviews and tests reveal ability.
- Credit checks before lending.
Government interventions:
- Compulsory insurance (car, health) β forces all into pool, prevents adverse selection.
- Disclosure regulations β accounting standards, food labelling, financial product disclosure.
- Licensing β quality assurance (doctors, lawyers, hairdressers).
- Consumer protection β Lemon Laws, refund rights.
- Anti-fraud regulation β securities law, advertising standards.
HL application. Asymmetric information is fundamental to modern microeconomics. Examiners may ask: How does asymmetric information lead to market failure? Why are some markets thin or non-existent? How can insurance markets avoid adverse selection?
Real-world example: Affordable Care Act (USA, 2010). Forced healthy people into insurance pool via individual mandate β reduced adverse selection. Mandate later weakened, demonstrating policy fragility.
- Adverse selection: BEFORE transaction; bad types crowd out good.
- Moral hazard: AFTER transaction; insured takes more risk.
- Signalling + screening = private solutions.
- Government: compulsory insurance, disclosure, licensing.