Cambridge International A Level Religious Studies 9484

πŸ“Ώ Cambridge A Level Religious Studies Reference Sheet 2026

World religions, philosophy of religion, applied topics and the named scholars β€” every framework and argument for Cambridge A Level Religious Studies 9484 in 2026.

World Religions Philosophy of Religion Applied Ethics Named Scholars

Our reference sheets are free to download β€” save this one as PDF for offline revision.

Aligned with the latest 2026 syllabus and board specifications. This sheet is prepared to match your exam board’s official specifications for the 2026 exam series.

All the Core A Level Religious Studies Arguments & Scholars in One Sheet

Cambridge A Level Religious Studies (9484) requires precise scholar engagement, philosophical argument and balanced essay technique. This reference sheet brings together the major religions, philosophical arguments, applied topics and named thinkers β€” everything you need for confident essay writing in 2026.

πŸ“–

Paper 1 β€” Two world religions in depth

πŸ’­

Paper 2 β€” Philosophy of religion & applied topics

✍️

Paper 3 β€” In-depth essay paper on chosen religion

πŸŽ“

Named scholars and essay-writing technique

Paper 1 β€” World Religions (Choose 2)

Each religion is studied across four areas: textual studies, beliefs & practices, leaders/figures, history & development.

Christianity

Choose-one study area: e.g. Gospels, Pauline letters, doctrine of God, Christology.

Texts

Synoptic Gospels, John, Pauline letters; historical-critical methods (Bultmann demythologisation)

Beliefs

Trinity, Incarnation, Atonement, salvation, eschatology

Figures

Jesus, Paul, early Church fathers; modern theologians (Bonhoeffer, Schleiermacher)

History

Early Church, councils, Reformation, modern movements

Islam

Texts

Qur'an, Hadith, Sunnah; Tafsir tradition

Beliefs

Tawhid, six articles of faith, five pillars

Figures

Prophet Muhammad, the four Rashidun caliphs, scholars (al-Ghazali, Ibn Sina)

History

Hijra, expansion, Sunni–Shi'a split, modern reform movements

Judaism

Texts

Tanakh (Torah, Nevi'im, Ketuvim), Talmud

Beliefs

Covenant, Maimonides' 13 principles, Messianic age

Figures

Abraham, Moses, prophets, Maimonides, Buber, Heschel

History

Exodus, exile, Diaspora, Holocaust, modern movements (Reform, Conservative, Orthodox)

Buddhism

Texts

Pali Canon (Tipitaka), Mahayana sutras

Beliefs

Three Marks of Existence, Four Noble Truths, Eightfold Path, Dependent Origination, anatta

Figures

Siddhartha Gautama, Nagarjuna, the Dalai Lamas

History

Schools β€” Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana; spread of Buddhism

Hinduism

Texts

Vedas, Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita, Ramayana, Mahabharata

Beliefs

Brahman, atman, dharma, karma, samsara, moksha; six darshanas

Figures

Krishna, Ram, Shankara, Ramanuja, Gandhi

History

Vedic period, classical Hinduism, Bhakti movement, modern reformers

Paper 2A β€” Philosophy of Religion: Arguments for God's Existence

Classical and modern arguments β€” know strengths, weaknesses and key scholars.

Cosmological Argument

From contingency/causation in the universe.

Aquinas β€” Five Ways

Motion, efficient cause, contingency, gradation, teleology β€” first three cosmological

Kalam (al-Ghazali)

Whatever begins to exist has a cause; the universe began to exist; therefore the universe has a cause

Hume's critique

Fallacy of composition; causation outside universe is unknowable

Teleological (Design) Argument

Paley

Watchmaker analogy β€” design implies designer

Aquinas β€” 5th Way

Goal-directed behaviour in nature requires intelligence

Critiques

Hume β€” bad analogy, evil suggests imperfect designer Β· Darwin β€” natural selection explains apparent design

Modern

Tennant's anthropic principle; fine-tuning argument

Ontological Argument

A priori β€” God's existence from definition.

Anselm β€” Proslogion

God = 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived'; existence in reality > existence in mind alone; therefore God exists

Descartes

God's perfection necessarily includes existence

Plantinga β€” modal

If God exists in any possible world, God exists in all possible worlds

Critiques

Gaunilo's perfect island Β· Kant β€” existence is not a predicate

Religious Experience

William James

Four marks: ineffability, noetic, transient, passive β€” pragmatic cumulative argument

Otto

Numinous β€” mysterium tremendum et fascinans

Schleiermacher

Religion as 'feeling of absolute dependence'

Critiques

Naturalistic explanations (Freud, neuroscience); how to verify private experience?

Paper 2A β€” Problem of Evil & Religious Language

Theodicies and the meaningfulness of religious statements.

Problem of Evil

Logical (Mackie)

Inconsistent triad: God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, evil exists β€” cannot all be true

Evidential (Hume)

Quantity and distribution of evil makes God improbable

Theodicies

Augustinian

Evil is privatio boni; original sin via free will of Adam β€” soul-deciding theodicy

Irenaean / Hick

Soul-making β€” evil is necessary for moral and spiritual growth; epistemic distance

Free Will Defence (Plantinga)

Genuine freedom requires the possibility of moral evil

Process Theology

God is not omnipotent in classical sense; persuades rather than coerces

Religious Language

Verification (Ayer)

Statements meaningful only if analytic or empirically verifiable β€” religious claims meaningless

Falsification (Flew)

Religious claims die 'death of a thousand qualifications'

Hare's bliks

Unfalsifiable but meaningful worldviews

Wittgenstein

Language games β€” religious language meaningful within its own form of life

Tillich

Symbols participate in what they signify; God = ground of being

Paper 2B β€” Topics in Religion

Choose ONE thematic area: ethics, gender, environment, science.

Religion & Ethics

Natural Law (Aquinas)

Five primary precepts derived from synderesis: preserve life, reproduce, educate, live in society, worship God

Situation Ethics (Fletcher)

Only intrinsically good thing is agape love; context decides the right action

Utilitarianism (Mill, Singer)

Greatest happiness principle; preference utilitarianism β€” applied ethics (Singer on poverty, animal rights)

Religion & Gender

Patriarchal readings of scripture vs feminist theology (Daly, Ruether) Β· women's roles in worship and leadership across traditions

Religion & Environment

White's critique of Christianity & ecological crisis Β· stewardship vs dominion Β· Buddhist & Hindu interconnectedness Β· Laudato Si' Pope Francis

Religion & Science

Conflict (Dawkins) vs independence (Gould NOMA) vs dialogue/integration (Polkinghorne) Β· creationism, intelligent design, theistic evolution

Paper 3 β€” In-Depth Essay Paper

Extended essays on the chosen religion(s) β€” synoptic, evaluative, scholar-rich.

Question Types

Critical assessment of doctrines, practices, historical developments, modern challenges to your chosen religion
Synoptic links across textual, doctrinal and practical strands

What Top Answers Show

Wide range of named scholars (insider + outsider perspectives)
Engagement with primary texts in original where appropriate
Sustained evaluation β€” not just description of beliefs
Awareness of intra-traditional diversity (e.g. Sunni/Shi'a; Theravada/Mahayana)

Named Scholars β€” Quick Reference

Memorise the headline argument or contribution of each.

Classical Philosophers

Anselm β€” ontological argument Β· Aquinas β€” Five Ways, Natural Law Β· Hume β€” critiques of design and miracles Β· Kant β€” moral argument, existence not a predicate Β· Mill β€” utilitarianism

Religious Experience & Language

William James β€” four marks of mystical experience Β· Otto β€” numinous Β· Plantinga β€” reformed epistemology Β· Wittgenstein β€” language games Β· Tillich β€” symbol & ground of being

Theology & Ethics

Bultmann β€” demythologisation Β· Bonhoeffer β€” religionless Christianity Β· Schleiermacher β€” feeling of absolute dependence Β· Fletcher β€” situation ethics Β· Singer β€” applied utilitarianism

Critics & Atheists

Mackie β€” inconsistent triad Β· Flew β€” falsification Β· Ayer β€” verification Β· Russell β€” teapot Β· Dawkins β€” conflict thesis

Essay Technique β€” Religious Studies

Cambridge rewards balanced, scholar-rich argument with personal judgement.

Essay Structure

Intro

Define key terms, show awareness of question complexity, signpost thesis

Body

3–4 supporting paragraphs (with named scholars + textual reference) followed by 2–3 counter-points

Conclusion

Reasoned judgement that addresses the question explicitly

Use of Scholars

Quote or paraphrase precisely β€” name the scholar and the work where possible
Engage critically β€” agree, qualify or refute; don't just describe

AO Skills

AO1 Knowledge & understanding (50%) β€” accurate doctrines, scholars, texts
AO2 Analysis & evaluation (50%) β€” sustained argument, balanced critique, personal judgement

How to Use This Reference Sheet

Boost your Cambridge exam confidence with these proven study strategies from our tutoring experts.

πŸ“–

Quote Primary Texts Precisely

Every essay should reference at least one primary text β€” Bible, Qur'an, Bhagavad Gita, Pali Canon. Memorise 2–3 short quotes per topic.

πŸ‘€

Build Scholar Cards

Make a card per scholar with their argument, key terms, and one critical response. Aim for 4–6 named scholars per topic.

βš–οΈ

Always Balance Argument

Top-band Religious Studies essays present the strongest version of the opposing view before responding β€” avoid straw-manning.

πŸ”„

Practise Synoptic Linking

Paper 3 rewards links across textual, doctrinal and practical strands. Practise mapping connections rather than treating topics in isolation.

Reference Sheet FAQ

Quick answers about this free PDF and how to use it for exam revision and active recall.

Is the Cambridge A Level Religious Studies Reference Sheet 2026 free to download as a PDF?

Yes. This Tutopiya formula sheet is free to use and you can download it as a PDF from this page for offline revision. There is no payment or account required for the PDF download.

What Religious Studies topics and equations does this formula sheet cover?

This page groups key Religious Studies formulas in one place for revision. Master Cambridge A Level Religious Studies (9484) with this 2026 reference sheet. Covers world religions, philosophy of religion, applied topics, and named scholars including Anselm, Aquinas, Hume, Kant, Wittgenstein … Always cross-check with your official syllabus and past papers for your exam session.

Can I use this instead of the official exam formula booklet in the exam?

No. In the exam you must follow only what your exam board allows in the hallβ€”usually the official formula booklet or data sheet where provided. This page is a revision and teaching aid, not a replacement for board-issued materials.

Who is this formula sheet for (Post-Secondary)?

It is written for students preparing for assessments at Post-Secondary in Religious Studies, including classroom revision, homework support, and independent study. Teachers and tutors can also share it as a quick reference.

How should I revise with this formula sheet?

Work through past paper questions, quote the correct formula before substituting values, and check units and notation every time. Pair this sheet with timed practice and mark schemes so you see how examiners expect working to be set out.

Where can I get more help with Religious Studies revision?

Explore Tutopiya’s study tools, past paper finder, and revision checklists linked from our tools hub, or book a trial lesson with a subject specialist for personalised support alongside this formula reference.

Need Help with Cambridge A Level Religious Studies?

Work through philosophical arguments, scholar engagement and essay structure with an experienced Cambridge A Level Religious Studies tutor. We focus on critical evaluation, textual precision and balanced argument.

This reference sheet aligns with Cambridge Assessment International Education International A Level Religious Studies (9484) syllabus content for 2026 examinations.

Always engage with named scholars and primary texts β€” generic references to 'religious people believe' lose top-band marks.