Why is "Describing the four (or seven) Ps as separate, unconnected paragraphs instead of an integrated, coherent mix." a common mistake in The seven Ps of the marketing mix?

Why it happens: Students revise each P in isolation and treat 'the marketing mix' as a checklist to list rather than a system to align. How to avoid it: Always tie the Ps to ONE positioning and show they reinforce each other. In an AO3 recommend, explicitly state how each P supports the same brand image. Source: IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — AO3 evaluation of the marketing mix.

Why is "Confusing penetration pricing with price skimming." a common mistake in The seven Ps of the marketing mix?

Why it happens: Both are launch strategies, so students memorise them together and swap the LOW-price and HIGH-price definitions. How to avoid it: Anchor it: PENETRATION = a low price to PENETRATE the mass market (volume); SKIMMING = a high price to SKIM profit off early adopters (margin). They are opposites. Source: IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — pricing strategies.

Why is "Treating the product life cycle as a fixed, inevitable shape and claiming decline is unavoidable." a common mistake in The seven Ps of the marketing mix?

Why it happens: The textbook curve is always drawn the same way, so students assume every product follows it identically. How to avoid it: Present the PLC as a MODEL: length and shape vary (fads spike and crash; classics stay mature for decades), and extension strategies can reshape it. Never say decline is guaranteed. Source: IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — product life cycle.

Why is "Mislabelling above-the-line and below-the-line promotion (e.g. calling a shop discount 'ATL')." a common mistake in The seven Ps of the marketing mix?

Why it happens: The ATL/BTL terms are abstract and students do not have a clear test for which is which. How to avoid it: Use the control test: independent MASS media the firm pays for but cannot control = ATL (TV, billboards); anything the firm controls and targets (discounts, mailshots, personal selling, PR) = BTL. Source: IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — the promotional mix.

Why is "In a pricing calculation, adding the mark-up % to the PRICE instead of the COST, or confusing mark-up with profit margin." a common mistake in The seven Ps of the marketing mix?

Why it happens: Mark-up and margin both produce a percentage, and students apply the percentage to the wrong base. How to avoid it: Mark-up is ALWAYS on cost: Price = cost × (1 + mark-up %). Margin is on price. For a 20 cost and 30 price, that is a 50% mark-up but a 33.3% margin. Source: IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — Paper 2 quantitative pricing.

Why is "Ignoring the HL extension (People, Process, Physical evidence) when the case is a SERVICE, or forcing all seven Ps onto a physical good." a common mistake in The seven Ps of the marketing mix?

Why it happens: Students default to the four Ps they learned first and forget services need the extra three, or bolt them on where they add little. How to avoid it: Match the model to the product: use the seven Ps for services (spas, hotels, airlines, restaurants) where People/Process/Physical evidence are decisive, and the four Ps where they add little. Source: IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — HL extension: the seven Ps of services marketing.

IB DP Business Management (147712)

The seven Ps of the marketing mix

0% Complete

Detailed Study Notes

Detailed notes on Marketing for IB DP Business Management, covering key concepts, explanations, examples, and exam-focused revision points.

The seven Ps — designing a coherent marketing mix

The marketing mix is the set of controllable elements a business blends to sell a product profitably. The CORE four Ps are Product, Price, Place and Promotion (SL and HL). For services, HL adds three more — People, Process and Physical evidence — giving the seven Ps. The single most examined skill is not describing each P in isolation but judging whether the whole mix is COHERENT: every element must reinforce the same brand positioning. Premium pricing sold through discount channels with cheap packaging is the classic inconsistent-mix flaw examiners reward you for spotting.

At a glance

Core 4 Ps (SL & HL): Product, Price, Place, Promotion — the controllable tools of marketing.
HL extension (+3 Ps for services): People, Process, Physical evidence = the seven Ps.
Product: the product life cycle (introduction, growth, maturity, decline), extension strategies, portfolio (link to the BCG matrix) and branding.
Price strategies: penetration, skimming, cost-plus/mark-up, competitive, psychological, loss leader, price discrimination, dynamic.
Place: distribution channels — direct, retailer, wholesaler, agent; and e-commerce/multichannel.
Promotion: above-the-line (ATL) vs below-the-line (BTL); the promotional mix (advertising, sales promotion, PR, personal selling, direct/digital/social).
The key exam skill (AO3): recommend a COHERENT mix consistent with the brand's positioning, and identify an INCONSISTENT mix as an evaluative flaw.
Command-term focus: Define/State a P (AO1, 2), Explain/Analyse a mix element in context (AO2, 4–6), Recommend/evaluate a coherent mix (AO3, ~10).

What you’ll learn

Mapped to the IB DP Business Management subject guide (2024 onwards (first assessment May 2024)).

Define the elements of the marketing mix and distinguish the core four Ps from the HL extension (People, Process, Physical evidence).
Describe the stages of the product life cycle, apply extension strategies, and link the product portfolio to the BCG matrix and branding.
Compare pricing strategies (penetration, skimming, cost-plus, competitive, psychological, loss leader, price discrimination, dynamic) and calculate a cost-plus price and mark-up.
Explain distribution channels (direct, retailer, wholesaler, agent) and multichannel/e-commerce, and the promotional mix split into ATL and BTL.
Recommend a coherent marketing mix aligned to a brand's positioning, and evaluate a mix for internal consistency.

What the marketing mix is — and why coherence matters

Seven controllable elements that must all pull in the same direction.

The marketing mix is the combination of controllable variables a business uses to meet the needs of its target market and achieve its marketing objectives. The traditional model has four Ps; for services the HL syllabus adds three more, giving the seven Ps.

#	P	What it decides
1	Product	The good/service itself — features, quality, design, branding, life-cycle stage.
2	Price	How much customers pay and the strategy behind it.
3	Place	How and where the product reaches the customer (distribution channels).
4	Promotion	How the business communicates with and persuades customers.
5	People (HL)	Staff who deliver and represent the service.
6	Process (HL)	The systems and procedures that deliver the service.
7	Physical evidence (HL)	The tangible cues that make an intangible service credible.

The mix must fit the target market and the firm's positioning (where the brand sits in customers' minds — e.g. luxury vs budget). The examiner's core test is coherence/consistency: every P should reinforce the same message. A luxury watch (premium product) should carry a high price, sell through exclusive boutiques (place), use aspirational advertising (promotion) and be served by expert staff in a beautifully designed store. Mix a premium product with a cut-price loss-leader tag sold in discount bargain bins and the positioning collapses — an inconsistent mix.

The 4 Ps are controllable; the external environment (STEEPLE, competitors) is not.
The mix must be tailored to the target market segment and the brand's positioning.
Coherence = every P sends the same signal; inconsistency destroys positioning.
HL only: People, Process and Physical evidence extend the model to services.

Product: the product life cycle, extension and portfolio

The PLC tracks sales over time; extension strategies delay decline.

Product covers the good or service itself: its features, quality, design and branding (the name, logo and identity that differentiate it and can command a price premium and loyalty).

The product life cycle (PLC) maps a product's sales over time through four stages. It guides marketing decisions but is NOT fixed or inevitable — good management can lengthen it, and some products die early.

Stage	Sales & cash	Typical marketing action
Introduction	Low sales, high launch/promotion cost, often loss-making.	Build awareness; skimming or penetration pricing; heavy promotion.
Growth	Sales rise fast, product turns profitable, rivals enter.	Widen distribution; build the brand; may cut price to win share.
Maturity	Sales peak then plateau; strong competition; highest profit.	Defend share; extension strategies; differentiate; efficiency.
Decline	Sales and profit fall as tastes/technology move on.	Harvest, reduce cost, or withdraw and replace.

Extension strategies delay decline and prolong maturity: new features/restyling, new packaging, finding new markets/uses, new advertising campaigns, price cuts, and new distribution channels (e.g. going online). Classic example: repositioning an ageing snack for a new demographic.

Product portfolio — most firms sell several products at different PLC stages so cash flow is smoothed (a "balanced portfolio"). This links directly to the BCG matrix: Stars (high share, high growth), Cash cows (high share, low growth — usually mature products funding the rest), Question marks/Problem children (low share, high growth) and Dogs (low share, low growth — often in decline).

PLC stages: Introduction → Growth → Maturity → Decline.
Extension strategies (restyle, new packaging, new markets/uses, new promotion, price cuts, new channels) prolong maturity.
A balanced portfolio holds products at different PLC stages; map them on the BCG matrix (Stars, Cash cows, Question marks, Dogs).
Branding differentiates the product and supports a price premium and loyalty.

Price: strategies and the numbers

Eight strategies — choose one that fits the product, market and PLC stage.

Price is the only P that directly earns revenue (the others cost money). The right strategy depends on the product, competition, costs, the PLC stage and — crucially — the positioning the mix is trying to project.

Strategy	What it is	When to use it
Penetration	Deliberately LOW launch price to win market share fast.	New product entering a competitive/price-sensitive mass market.
Skimming	HIGH launch price to early adopters, later lowered.	Innovative/tech product with little competition (e.g. new smartphone).
Cost-plus (mark-up)	Add a fixed profit % to unit cost to set price.	Simple, safe method when costs are known and predictable.
Competitive	Price around rivals' prices (match or reference them).	Markets with strong, similar competitors; little differentiation.
Psychological	Prices that feel lower or signal value (e.g. $9.99; premium pricing to signal quality).	Consumer goods where perception drives buying.
Loss leader	Price a product below cost to draw customers who then buy other, profitable items.	Supermarkets/retail with wide ranges (e.g. cheap milk).
Price discrimination	Charge different prices to different groups/times for the same product.	Where markets can be separated (student fares, peak/off-peak).
Dynamic	Prices change in real time with demand, supply or data.	Airlines, ride-hailing, e-commerce, ticketing.

Penetration vs skimming is the most-confused pair: penetration = LOW price to grab volume; skimming = HIGH price to grab margin from early adopters. They are opposites.

Two calculations you must be able to do (Paper 2):

Cost-plus price = unit cost × (1 + mark-up %). E.g. unit cost $20, 50% mark-up → 20 × 1.5 = **$ 30**.
Mark-up % = (price − cost) ÷ cost × 100. E.g. price $30, cost$ 20 → 10 ÷ 20 × 100 = 50%.

(Do not confuse mark-up on cost with margin on price: a $30 price on a$ 20 cost is a 50% mark-up but a 33.3% profit margin.)

Only price generates revenue; the other Ps generate costs.
Penetration = low launch price (volume/share); skimming = high launch price (margin from early adopters).
Cost-plus price = unit cost × (1 + mark-up %); mark-up % = (price − cost) ÷ cost × 100.
The chosen price MUST match the positioning: premium price for a premium product, low price for a value brand.

See the full worked example for the seven ps of the marketing mix →

Place and Promotion: getting it there and getting it noticed

Distribution channels move the product; ATL and BTL communicate it.

Place (distribution) is how the product gets from producer to consumer. The choice of channel affects cost, control, reach and — again — positioning (exclusive boutiques signal luxury; mass discount shelves signal value).

Channel	Route	Typical use
Direct (zero-intermediary)	Producer → consumer (own shop/website/factory outlet).	Full control and margin; e-commerce, D2C brands.
One-intermediary	Producer → retailer → consumer.	Consumer goods sold through shops.
Two-intermediary	Producer → wholesaler → retailer → consumer.	Where many small retailers buy in small quantities.
Agent/broker	Producer → agent → (retailer) → consumer.	Exports, insurance, property — agent has market access/expertise.

Multichannel / omnichannel distribution uses several routes at once (store + website + app + marketplace). E-commerce widens reach and cuts some costs but adds delivery/returns logistics and price transparency.

Promotion communicates with and persuades the target market. It splits into two families:

	Above-the-line (ATL)	Below-the-line (BTL)
Definition	Paid promotion through mass, independent media the firm does not control.	Promotion the firm controls directly, often targeted.
Examples	TV, radio, cinema, print, billboards.	Sales promotions (discounts, BOGOF, loyalty schemes), direct mail, personal selling, sponsorship, PR, point-of-sale.
Best for	Building broad awareness for mass-market products.	Targeted, measurable response and building relationships.
Downside	Expensive; hard to measure; less targeted.	Limited reach; can feel intrusive; some erode margins.

The wider promotional mix blends: advertising, sales promotion, public relations (PR), personal selling and direct/digital/social marketing. Digital and social media blur the ATL/BTL line — a paid social ad is broad reach (ATL-like) yet highly targeted and measurable (BTL-like), which is why some now use "through-the-line".

Channels: direct (zero), retailer (one), wholesaler+retailer (two), or agent — trade off cost, control and reach.
E-commerce/multichannel widens reach but adds logistics and price transparency.
ATL = paid mass media the firm does NOT control (TV, print, billboards); BTL = firm-controlled, targeted (sales promotion, personal selling, PR, direct/digital).
The promotional mix = advertising + sales promotion + PR + personal selling + direct/digital/social.

HL only: People, Process and Physical evidence (services marketing)

For services, three extra Ps make the intangible tangible — and coherence is the exam skill.

HL EXTENSION. Services are intangible, perishable, variable and inseparable from the person delivering them, so the four Ps alone are not enough. HL adds three service-specific Ps:

P (HL)	What it means	Coherence example (a premium spa)	Inconsistency that breaks it
People	The staff who deliver and represent the service — their skill, attitude, training and appearance. In services the staff ARE the product.	Highly trained, warm, expert therapists.	Rude or untrained staff on premium prices.
Process	The systems and procedures that deliver the service — booking, waiting time, ordering, after-sales, consistency.	Smooth online booking, no waiting, a seamless experience.	Long queues and clumsy booking for a "luxury" service.
Physical evidence	The tangible cues that make an intangible service credible — premises, décor, uniforms, packaging, ambience, website look.	Elegant interiors, plush robes, calming design.	A shabby, cheap-looking reception charging premium prices.

Because services cannot be tried before purchase, customers judge quality from these cues. The HL skill is to recommend a coherent seven-P mix: for a service, People, Process and Physical evidence must reinforce the SAME positioning as Product, Price, Place and Promotion. A five-star hotel that charges premium prices (Price) but has slow check-in (Process), disengaged staff (People) and a tired lobby (Physical evidence) has an inconsistent mix — the premium price is not credible, and customers feel over-charged.

Link to the key concepts: designing a service mix well requires creativity (a distinctive experience) and manages change (adapting the process as customer expectations shift); a strong, consistent seven-P experience is a source of competitive advantage that is hard for rivals to copy.

HL adds People, Process, Physical evidence for SERVICES (intangible, perishable, variable, inseparable).
People: in services the staff are effectively the product — training and attitude are marketing decisions.
Process: the delivery system (booking, waiting, after-sales) is part of the customer experience.
Physical evidence: tangible cues (premises, packaging, ambience) make the intangible service credible.
Coherence test: all seven Ps must reinforce the same positioning — inconsistency is the classic evaluative flaw.

See the full worked example for the seven ps of the marketing mix →

Quick recap

Marketing mix = controllable elements; core 4 Ps (Product, Price, Place, Promotion) + HL extension (People, Process, Physical evidence) = 7 Ps.
Product: PLC (Intro → Growth → Maturity → Decline), extension strategies prolong maturity, portfolio links to the BCG matrix; branding differentiates.
Price strategies: penetration (low), skimming (high), cost-plus, competitive, psychological, loss leader, price discrimination, dynamic — cost-plus price = cost × (1 + mark-up %).
Place: direct/retailer/wholesaler/agent + multichannel/e-commerce; distribution signals positioning.
Promotion: ATL (paid mass media, not controlled) vs BTL (firm-controlled, targeted); promotional mix = advertising, sales promotion, PR, personal selling, direct/digital/social.
The examiner's key skill: recommend a COHERENT mix aligned to positioning; spot INCONSISTENT mixes (e.g. premium price + discount distribution) as the classic flaw.

Memorise this

Verbatim phrases, formulae and definitions IB DP mark schemes credit (key for AO1 knowledge marks on Paper 1).

The 7 Ps: Product, Price, Place, Promotion (core) + People, Process, Physical evidence (HL).
PLC stages: Introduction, Growth, Maturity, Decline.
Pricing strategies: penetration, skimming, cost-plus/mark-up, competitive, psychological, loss leader, price discrimination, dynamic.
Cost-plus price = unit cost × (1 + mark-up %); mark-up % = (price − cost) ÷ cost × 100.
ATL = mass media, not controlled (TV, print); BTL = firm-controlled, targeted (sales promotion, PR, personal selling, direct/digital).
Extension strategies: restyle, new packaging, new markets/uses, new promotion, price cuts, new channels.

How it’s examined

Paper 1 and Paper 2 draw on this topic qualitatively; Paper 2 can add a quantitative pricing calculation (cost-plus price or mark-up %). Expect: AO1 define/state a P, strategy or PLC stage (2 marks); AO2 explain or analyse a mix element in a given business context (4–6 marks); AO3 recommend and justify a coherent marketing mix, or evaluate a mix's consistency (~10 marks). The highest-scoring AO3 answers treat the Ps as an integrated package that reinforces one brand positioning, and explicitly flag any inconsistency (e.g. premium price with mass-market distribution). Relevant key concepts: change and creativity.

Sources: IB Diploma Programme Business Management Guide (first teaching 2022, first assessment 2024). Last reviewed 2026-07-24.

Take this whole topic with you

Step-by-step worked examples — The seven Ps of the marketing mix

Step-by-step solutions to past-paper-style questions on the seven ps of the marketing mix, written exactly the way a tutor would explain them at the board.

1Naming the four Ps in context
Getting started• four Ps, AO1
Question
State the four elements of the marketing mix and give one decision each represents for a smartphone maker, PixelCo. [4]
Step-by-step solution
1. Step 1
  Recall the core four Ps: Product, Price, Place, Promotion.
2. Step 2
  Attach one concrete PixelCo decision to each P so the answer is applied, not generic.
Answer
Product — the phone's features and design (e.g. camera quality). Price — how much to charge (e.g. a skimming launch price). Place — where it is sold (e.g. its own online store and networks). Promotion — how it is advertised (e.g. a TV campaign at launch).
Examiner tip
AO1/AO2. Naming the four Ps earns the identification marks; the applied PixelCo decision secures full marks. Listing the Ps with no decision caps the answer.
2Ordering the product life cycle
Getting started• product life cycle, AO1
Question
State the four stages of the product life cycle in order and describe sales in each. [4]
Step-by-step solution
1. Step 1
  The stages run Introduction → Growth → Maturity → Decline.
2. Step 2
  Describe the sales trend at each stage: low, rising fast, peak/plateau, falling.
Answer
Introduction — sales are low as the product is launched. 2) Growth — sales rise rapidly as it catches on. 3) Maturity — sales peak and then plateau as the market saturates. 4) Decline — sales fall as tastes or technology move on.
Examiner tip
AO1. Correct ORDER matters. A common slip is placing maturity before growth. Link each stage to the sales trend for full marks.
3Cost-plus (mark-up) price calculation
Getting started• pricing, cost-plus, calculation
Question
A furniture maker's unit cost per chair is $80. It applies a 40% mark-up. Calculate the selling price. [2]
Step-by-step solution
1. Step 1
  Use cost-plus pricing: add the mark-up percentage to the unit cost.
  $Price = Unit cost x (1 + mark-up %)$
2. Step 2
  Substitute the values and compute.
  $Price = 80 x (1 + 0.40) = 80 x 1.40 = 112$
Answer
The selling price is $112 per chair.
Examiner tip
AO2/Paper 2. Show the working. A frequent error is adding 40% of the price rather than 40% of COST — always multiply the cost by 1.40.
4Penetration vs skimming
Building confidence• pricing, penetration, skimming
Question
Distinguish between penetration pricing and skimming, and recommend one for a firm launching an innovative fitness tracker with no direct competitors. [6]
Step-by-step solution
1. Step 1
  Penetration = a deliberately LOW launch price to win market share quickly. Skimming = a HIGH launch price aimed at early adopters, lowered over time.
2. Step 2
  Match to the case: no direct competitors and an innovative product means early adopters will pay a premium, so skimming captures high margins before rivals arrive.
3. Step 3
  Justify and note a condition: skimming works while competition is low, but the firm must cut price as rivals enter.
Answer
Penetration pricing sets a low launch price to grab market share fast; skimming sets a high launch price to earn high margins from early adopters, then lowers it. Because the tracker is innovative with NO direct competitors, skimming is the better fit: keen early adopters will pay a premium, letting the firm recover development costs and signal quality. As competitors enter, it should lower the price to defend share — so skimming now, penetration-style pricing later.
Examiner tip
AO2/AO3. The distinction plus an applied, justified choice scores well. Reversing the two definitions (the single most common error) loses the core marks.
5Choosing a distribution channel
Building confidence• place, distribution channels
Question
A small artisan chocolate maker is deciding between selling directly through its own website or through a national supermarket chain (a retailer). Analyse one advantage of each. [6]
Step-by-step solution
1. Step 1
  Direct (own website): full control of price, brand presentation and customer data, and a higher margin because there is no retailer taking a cut.
2. Step 2
  Retailer (supermarket): far greater reach and volume — access to millions of shoppers the small firm could never reach alone.
3. Step 3
  Note the positioning tension: direct sales protect a premium artisan image; a supermarket boosts volume but can dilute exclusivity and squeeze margins.
Answer
Selling direct via its own website lets the chocolate maker keep full control of its premium brand presentation and pricing and earn a higher margin (no retailer cut) — reinforcing an exclusive artisan positioning. Selling through a national supermarket gives huge reach and volume, exposing the product to millions of shoppers and driving rapid sales growth. The trade-off is control and margin (direct) versus reach and volume (retailer); for a premium artisan brand, direct sales better protect positioning, while a supermarket suits a volume strategy but risks diluting exclusivity.
Examiner tip
AO2. Each channel advantage must be explained with its effect. The strongest answers link the choice to the brand's POSITIONING, not just cost.
6ATL vs BTL promotion
Building confidence• promotion, ATL, BTL
Question
Distinguish between above-the-line and below-the-line promotion, giving one example of each for a new energy drink. [4]
Step-by-step solution
1. Step 1
  ATL = paid promotion through independent MASS media the firm does not control (builds broad awareness).
2. Step 2
  BTL = promotion the firm controls directly and targets (measurable, relationship-building).
3. Step 3
  Give an energy-drink example of each: a TV/billboard campaign (ATL) vs free samples at a gym or a sports sponsorship (BTL).
Answer
Above-the-line promotion uses paid, independent mass media the firm cannot control — e.g. a national TV or billboard campaign for the energy drink to build broad awareness. Below-the-line promotion is directly controlled and targeted — e.g. free samples handed out at gyms or a sales-promotion voucher — reaching the target audience more precisely and measurably.
Examiner tip
AO1/AO2. Mark rests on the contrast: mass, uncontrolled media (ATL) vs firm-controlled, targeted methods (BTL). Mislabelling examples is the classic error.
7Extension strategies for a maturing product
Stretch• product life cycle, extension strategies, Stretch
Question
A breakfast cereal has reached maturity and sales have plateaued. Recommend two extension strategies and justify which is likely to be most effective. [6]
Step-by-step solution
1. Step 1
  Select two valid extension strategies: e.g. new packaging/reformulation targeting health-conscious buyers, and finding a new market/use (e.g. an on-the-go snack bar version).
2. Step 2
  Explain how each prolongs maturity by reviving demand or reaching new customers.
3. Step 3
  Judge which is stronger for this case and note the risk (cost, cannibalisation) — a justified recommendation.
Answer
Strategy 1 — reformulate and rebrand as a healthier (lower-sugar, high-fibre) cereal with new packaging, tapping the fast-growing health-conscious segment and reviving sales among existing shoppers. Strategy 2 — enter a new market/use by launching a portable cereal bar for on-the-go breakfasts, reaching busy consumers the boxed product misses. The health reformulation is likely most effective because it addresses the structural reason cereal sales are falling (health concerns) and leverages the existing brand, whereas a new bar format needs fresh distribution and marketing spend. The firm should reformulate first, then test a bar format — provided reformulation does not alienate loyal buyers.
Examiner tip
AO3-lite/AO2. Two developed strategies plus a justified choice with a caveat reaches the top. Merely listing 'change packaging, advertise more' with no reasoning stays low.
8Spot the inconsistent mix
Stretch• coherent mix, inconsistent mix, pricing, Stretch
Question
LuxeLeather positions itself as a premium handbag brand. Its unit cost is $150 and it wants a 60% mark-up, but it plans to sell through discount outlet malls with cheap plastic packaging and a 'buy-one-get-one-free' promotion. Calculate its cost-plus price, then analyse why this marketing mix is inconsistent. [6]
Step-by-step solution
1. Step 1
  Calculate the intended premium price using cost-plus.
  $Price = 150 x (1 + 0.60) = 150 x 1.60 = 240$
2. Step 2
  Identify the positioning each element signals: a $240 premium price and 60% mark-up signal luxury (Product/Price aligned).
3. Step 3
  Show the clash: discount-mall distribution, cheap packaging (physical evidence) and BOGOF promotion all signal LOW value — contradicting the premium price.
4. Step 4
  Conclude: the mix is incoherent, so the premium price is not credible and the brand's positioning collapses.
Answer
Cost-plus price = 150 × 1.60 = $240. The mix is inconsistent because the Ps send OPPOSITE signals. Product and Price say 'premium' ($ 240 handbag, 60% mark-up), but Place (discount outlet malls), physical evidence (cheap plastic packaging) and Promotion (BOGOF) all say 'budget/mass-market'. Customers reading these cheap cues will doubt the $240 price is justified, so either they will not buy at that price or the brand's premium image is destroyed. A coherent premium mix would use exclusive boutiques, luxurious packaging and aspirational advertising — no discounting. The inconsistency, not any single P, is the flaw.
Examiner tip
AO2/AO3 with a calculation. Reward the correct price AND the explicit identification of WHICH Ps clash and WHY. This 'coherence' analysis is exactly what top-band marketing answers demonstrate.
9HL — the seven-P mix for a service
Stretch• HL, People, Process, Physical evidence, services, Stretch
Question
HL. A new premium boutique gym is designing its marketing mix. Explain how People, Process and Physical evidence should each reinforce its premium positioning, and identify one inconsistency that would undermine it. [6]
Step-by-step solution
1. Step 1
  People: highly qualified, attentive personal trainers who embody premium, personalised service — in a service the staff ARE the product.
2. Step 2
  Process: a smooth, frictionless experience — easy app booking, no crowding, personalised programmes — signalling exclusivity.
3. Step 3
  Physical evidence: high-end interiors, premium equipment, spa-quality changing rooms — tangible cues that justify the price.
4. Step 4
  Inconsistency: e.g. overcrowded classes and long waits (poor Process) or budget, worn equipment (weak Physical evidence) would contradict the premium price.
Answer
People — expert, attentive personal trainers deliver the premium, personalised service that justifies high membership fees; in a gym the staff effectively ARE the product. Process — seamless app booking, capped class sizes and tailored programmes make the experience effortless and exclusive. Physical evidence — luxurious interiors, top-brand equipment and spa-quality facilities are the tangible cues that convince members the high price is worth it. An inconsistency such as overcrowded, hard-to-book classes (weak Process) or shabby, worn equipment (weak Physical evidence) would clash with the premium price, making members feel overcharged and eroding the positioning.
Examiner tip
AO2/AO3 (HL). Requires the three HL Ps applied to a SERVICE plus a coherence judgement. Treating People/Process/Physical evidence generically, without linking to the premium positioning, limits the marks.

Model Answers — The seven Ps of the marketing mix

High-scoring sample answers for the seven ps of the marketing mix on the Cambridge IGCSE paper, with examiner-style notes mapping each response to the mark scheme and assessment objectives.

Question 1
2 marks
Define the term marketing mix. [2]
Model answer
The marketing mix is the combination of controllable elements — the four Ps (Product, Price, Place, Promotion), extended to seven for services — that a business blends to meet the needs of its target market and achieve its marketing objectives.
Why this scores
AO1. Full marks need the idea of a COMBINATION of controllable elements aimed at the target market. Listing the Ps alone, with no notion of combining them, earns one mark.
Question 2
2 marks
State two stages of the product life cycle. [2]
Model answer
Two stages are growth (sales rising rapidly) and maturity (sales peaking and levelling off). The full cycle is introduction, growth, maturity and decline.
Why this scores
AO1. Any two of the four correct stages score. Adding a one-phrase description of each shows understanding but two valid names is the requirement.
Question 3
2 marks
Distinguish between above-the-line and below-the-line promotion. [2]
Model answer
Above-the-line promotion uses paid, independent mass media the firm does not control (e.g. TV, radio, billboards) to reach a broad audience. Below-the-line promotion is directly controlled and targeted by the firm (e.g. sales promotions, personal selling, direct mail, PR).
Why this scores
AO1. Mark rests on the contrast: mass, uncontrolled paid media (ATL) versus firm-controlled, targeted methods (BTL).
Question 4
4 marks
Explain two pricing strategies a supermarket might use. [4]
Model answer
Loss leader pricing: the supermarket sells a staple such as milk or bread below cost to draw shoppers into the store, who then buy other, profitable items — the overall basket is profitable even though the leader is not. Psychological pricing: prices are set just below a round figure (e.g. $2.99 rather than$ 3.00) so they feel notably cheaper, nudging customers to buy. Both strategies aim to increase footfall and total basket spend rather than profit on the single item.
Why this scores
AO2. Each strategy must be named AND explained with its effect on the supermarket (2 marks each). Naming two strategies without explaining how they work caps at 2 marks.
Question 5
6 marks
Analyse how a change in distribution channel could affect a small clothing brand's marketing mix. [6]
Model answer
Suppose a small premium clothing brand moves from selling directly through its own website to also selling through a large discount retailer. On the positive side, distribution reach and sales volume rise sharply, exposing the brand to far more customers and lifting revenue. However, the change ripples through the rest of the mix: the discount retailer may demand lower prices, undermining the brand's premium price positioning; the brand loses control of how its products are presented (physical evidence), risking a cheaper image; and it may need different promotion to reach the retailer's mass audience. So a Place decision is not isolated — it forces the brand to reconcile higher volume against a possible loss of premium positioning and margin.
Why this scores
AO2. The 5–6 band needs a developed chain of reasoning showing how ONE P (Place) affects the OTHERS (Price, Promotion, positioning). Answers that only describe the new channel, without the knock-on effects, stay mid-band.
Question 6
6 marks
A product costs $25 per unit to make. The firm adds a 60% mark-up. Calculate the selling price and explain one benefit and one drawback of cost-plus pricing. [6]
Model answer
Selling price = unit cost × (1 + mark-up %) = 25 × 1.60 = $40. Benefit: cost-plus pricing is simple and guarantees each unit covers its cost plus a profit margin, so the firm avoids selling at a loss and can price a wide range quickly. Drawback: it ignores what customers are willing to pay and what competitors charge — the$ 40 price may be too high if rivals sell similar products for $35 (losing sales) or too low if customers would happily pay$ 50 (leaving profit on the table). It is safe but not market-responsive.
Why this scores
AO2/Paper 2. Correct calculation (show 25 × 1.60) plus a genuine benefit and drawback. A frequent error is applying the 60% to the price rather than the cost.
Question 7
10 marks
SolaraTech is launching an innovative solar phone-charger with few competitors. Recommend a coherent marketing mix (all four Ps) to establish it as a premium, eco-friendly brand. [10]
Model answer
To position SolaraTech as premium and eco-friendly, every P must reinforce that image.

Product: a high-quality, well-designed charger with visible eco-credentials (recycled materials, certified carbon footprint) and strong branding — the eco-story IS the product's differentiator, and being an innovative product with few rivals, it sits in the introduction stage of the PLC.

Price: given the innovation and lack of competition, a skimming strategy suits — a high launch price signals quality and premium positioning while earning margins from eco-conscious early adopters, lowered later as rivals appear. A low penetration price would contradict the premium image.

Place: selective/exclusive distribution through the brand's own website and specialist eco and lifestyle retailers, protecting the premium feel — NOT mass discount outlets, which would cheapen it.

Promotion: aspirational digital and social-media campaigns and PR around sustainability, reaching eco-conscious consumers and reinforcing values, rather than heavy price-discount promotions that signal 'budget'.

Critically, these elements are mutually consistent: premium product + skimming price + selective distribution + values-led promotion all say 'premium and eco'. The main risk is that a high price limits early volume, so SolaraTech should plan to widen distribution and ease price as competition grows. Recommendation: launch with this coherent premium mix now, monitoring competitor entry to adjust price and reach — the coherence is what makes the premium price credible.
Why this scores
AO3 (~10 marks). Top band: all four Ps recommended AND shown to be mutually CONSISTENT with the premium/eco positioning, a justified recommendation, and a condition (adjust as competitors enter). Answers that describe four Ps in isolation, without demonstrating coherence, cannot reach the top band.
Question 8
10 marks
Evaluate the view that having a 'coherent' marketing mix matters more than getting any single P right. [10]
Model answer
There is strong support for the view. The Ps work as a system: a superb product priced wrongly, or a premium brand sold through discount channels, fails because the elements contradict each other. Coherence — every P reinforcing the same positioning — is what makes a brand credible; the classic marketing failure is an INCONSISTENT mix, such as premium pricing with mass-market discount distribution and cheap packaging, where a great product is undone by the surrounding Ps. In this sense the mix is only as strong as its consistency.

However, individual Ps can be decisive too. A fundamentally poor PRODUCT cannot be rescued by a coherent surrounding mix — quality is often the precondition. A badly wrong PRICE can make an otherwise coherent mix unaffordable or unprofitable. And for a service (HL), weak People or Process can destroy an otherwise premium mix regardless of overall alignment. So 'getting a single P right' can be a necessary condition, not just a detail.

On balance, coherence usually matters most because it is the overarching test that binds the Ps to a positioning and it exposes flaws that examining Ps individually would miss — but coherence assumes each P is at least competent. The strongest conclusion is that coherence and individual quality are complementary: a mix must be both internally consistent AND competent in each element, with consistency the higher-order requirement that gives the mix meaning. This reflects the key concept of change — the mix must be adapted as a whole, not one P at a time.
Why this scores
AO3 (~10 marks). Balance is essential: argue FOR coherence (the system view, the inconsistent-mix flaw) AND the case for individual Ps (a poor product/price cannot be saved), ending with a supported judgement. One-sided answers cannot reach the top band.
Question 9
HL extension (services marketing)10 marks
HL. WellNest is opening a premium day spa. Recommend a coherent seven-P marketing mix, giving particular attention to People, Process and Physical evidence, and evaluate the main risk to its consistency. [10]
Model answer
Because a spa is a SERVICE — intangible, perishable and delivered by staff — WellNest must design all seven Ps to reinforce a premium positioning.

Product: a range of high-quality, distinctive treatments and a strong, calming brand. Price: premium pricing (or cost-plus with a high mark-up) that signals quality and matches the positioning — a low price would undermine credibility. Place: a prestige location and controlled booking through its own site, not mass discount vouchers. Promotion: aspirational, image-led marketing and PR, with minimal discounting that would cheapen the brand.

The three HL Ps are decisive for a spa. People: highly trained, warm, professional therapists — in a service the staff ARE the product, so recruitment and training are marketing decisions. Process: a seamless, unhurried experience — easy booking, no waiting, personalised consultations — signalling exclusivity. Physical evidence: elegant interiors, plush robes, calming ambience and quality packaging that make the intangible service tangible and justify the premium price.

The main risk to consistency is that services are VARIABLE: quality depends on individual staff on the day, so one rude therapist (People) or a long wait and clumsy booking (Process) can shatter the premium experience even if every other P is perfect. WellNest must therefore standardise its process, invest heavily in training and monitor service quality. Recommendation: adopt this coherent premium seven-P mix, prioritising People and Process because they are the hardest to control yet the ones that most determine whether customers feel the premium price is justified. Consistency, not any single luxurious touch, is what sustains the positioning.
Why this scores
AO3 (~10 marks, HL). Top band: a coherent SEVEN-P mix with People, Process and Physical evidence properly applied to a service, plus an evaluation of the consistency risk (service variability) and a justified recommendation. Answers that treat the extra three Ps generically, or ignore coherence, stay mid-band.

Key Formulae — The seven Ps of the marketing mix

The formulae you need to memorise for the seven ps of the marketing mix on the Cambridge IGCSE paper, with every variable defined in plain English and a note on when to use it.

Cost-plus (mark-up) pricing
$\text{Price} = \text{Unit cost} \times (1 + \text{mark-up %})$
$Unit cost$
the cost of making one unit ($)
$mark-up$
the profit % added to cost (as a decimal)
When to use
To set a selling price by adding a fixed profit percentage to the unit cost. Simple and safe when costs are known, but it ignores demand and competitors' prices.
Example
20 x (1 + 0.5) = 30
Profit mark-up %
$\text{Mark-up %} = \dfrac{\text{Price} - \text{Cost}}{\text{Cost}} \times 100$
$Price$
the selling price per unit ($)
$Cost$
the unit cost per unit ($)
When to use
To find the profit percentage added ON COST when you know the price and the cost. Note this differs from profit MARGIN, which divides the profit by the PRICE, not the cost.
Example
(30 - 20) / 20 x 100 = 50

Key Definitions and Keywords — The seven Ps of the marketing mix

Definitions to memorise and the exact keywords mark schemes credit for the seven ps of the marketing mix answers — sharpened from recent examiner reports for the 2026 Cambridge IGCSE sitting.

Marketing mix
Examiner keyword
The combination of controllable elements (the four Ps, extended to seven for services) a business blends to satisfy its target market and meet marketing objectives.
Related: Target market, Positioning
Coherent (consistent) marketing mix
Examiner keyword
A mix in which every element reinforces the same brand positioning, so the Ps work together rather than sending conflicting signals.
Example
A luxury watch: premium product, high price, exclusive boutiques, aspirational advertising.
Product life cycle (PLC)
Examiner keyword
A model showing the stages a product passes through over time — introduction, growth, maturity and decline — measured by sales.
Related: Extension strategy, Maturity
Extension strategy
A marketing action taken to prolong the maturity stage and delay decline, such as restyling, new packaging, new markets/uses, new promotion or price cuts.
Example
Repositioning an ageing chocolate bar with new packaging aimed at a younger market.
Branding
Creating a distinctive name, logo, design and identity for a product to differentiate it, build loyalty and support a price premium.
Related: Product, Positioning
Penetration pricing
Examiner keyword
Setting a deliberately LOW launch price to enter a market and win market share quickly, later raised.
Price skimming
Examiner keyword
Setting a HIGH launch price aimed at early adopters willing to pay a premium, then lowering it over time as competition grows.
Example
A new smartphone launched at a high price, discounted a year later.
Cost-plus (mark-up) pricing
Examiner keyword
Setting price by adding a fixed profit percentage (mark-up) to the unit cost: Price = unit cost × (1 + mark-up %).
Loss leader
Pricing a product below cost to attract customers into the business, who then buy other, profitable products.
Example
A supermarket selling milk below cost to draw shoppers in.
Price discrimination
Charging different prices to different customer groups or at different times for the same product, where markets can be separated.
Example
Peak and off-peak train fares; student discounts.
Dynamic pricing
Adjusting prices in real time in response to changes in demand, supply or data.
Example
Airline and ride-hailing fares that rise at busy times.
Distribution channel (Place)
Examiner keyword
The route a product takes from producer to consumer — direct, or via a retailer, wholesaler or agent — and increasingly through multichannel/e-commerce.
Related: Multichannel distribution, E commerce
Above-the-line (ATL) promotion
Examiner keyword
Paid promotion through independent mass media the firm does not control (TV, radio, print, billboards), used to build broad awareness.
Below-the-line (BTL) promotion
Examiner keyword
Promotion the firm controls directly and targets — sales promotions, personal selling, direct mail, PR and point-of-sale materials.
People, Process, Physical evidence (HL)
Examiner keyword
The three extra Ps for services marketing: People (the staff delivering the service), Process (the systems/procedures that deliver it) and Physical evidence (the tangible cues that make an intangible service credible).
Example
A spa's therapists (People), its booking and treatment flow (Process) and its plush interiors (Physical evidence).

Common Mistakes and Misconceptions — The seven Ps of the marketing mix

The traps other students keep falling into on the seven ps of the marketing mix questions — taken from recent Cambridge IGCSE examiner reports and mark schemes — and how to avoid them.

✕Describing the four (or seven) Ps as separate, unconnected paragraphs instead of an integrated, coherent mix.
IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — AO3 evaluation of the marketing mix.
Why it happens
Students revise each P in isolation and treat 'the marketing mix' as a checklist to list rather than a system to align.
How to avoid it
Always tie the Ps to ONE positioning and show they reinforce each other. In an AO3 recommend, explicitly state how each P supports the same brand image.
✕Confusing penetration pricing with price skimming.
IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — pricing strategies.
Why it happens
Both are launch strategies, so students memorise them together and swap the LOW-price and HIGH-price definitions.
How to avoid it
Anchor it: PENETRATION = a low price to PENETRATE the mass market (volume); SKIMMING = a high price to SKIM profit off early adopters (margin). They are opposites.
✕Treating the product life cycle as a fixed, inevitable shape and claiming decline is unavoidable.
IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — product life cycle.
Why it happens
The textbook curve is always drawn the same way, so students assume every product follows it identically.
How to avoid it
Present the PLC as a MODEL: length and shape vary (fads spike and crash; classics stay mature for decades), and extension strategies can reshape it. Never say decline is guaranteed.
✕Mislabelling above-the-line and below-the-line promotion (e.g. calling a shop discount 'ATL').
IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — the promotional mix.
Why it happens
The ATL/BTL terms are abstract and students do not have a clear test for which is which.
How to avoid it
Use the control test: independent MASS media the firm pays for but cannot control = ATL (TV, billboards); anything the firm controls and targets (discounts, mailshots, personal selling, PR) = BTL.
✕In a pricing calculation, adding the mark-up % to the PRICE instead of the COST, or confusing mark-up with profit margin.
IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — Paper 2 quantitative pricing.
Why it happens
Mark-up and margin both produce a percentage, and students apply the percentage to the wrong base.
How to avoid it
Mark-up is ALWAYS on cost: Price = cost × (1 + mark-up %). Margin is on price. For a $20 cost and$ 30 price, that is a 50% mark-up but a 33.3% margin.
✕Ignoring the HL extension (People, Process, Physical evidence) when the case is a SERVICE, or forcing all seven Ps onto a physical good.
IB DP Business Management Guide (first assessment 2024) — HL extension: the seven Ps of services marketing.
Why it happens
Students default to the four Ps they learned first and forget services need the extra three, or bolt them on where they add little.
How to avoid it
Match the model to the product: use the seven Ps for services (spas, hotels, airlines, restaurants) where People/Process/Physical evidence are decisive, and the four Ps where they add little.

The seven Ps — designing a coherent marketing mix

What it decides

Product

The good/service itself — features, quality, design, branding, life-cycle stage.

Price

How much customers pay and the strategy behind it.

Place

How and where the product reaches the customer (distribution channels).

Promotion

How the business communicates with and persuades customers.

People (HL)

Staff who deliver and represent the service.

Process (HL)

The systems and procedures that deliver the service.

Physical evidence (HL)

The tangible cues that make an intangible service credible.

Stage

Sales & cash

Typical marketing action

Introduction

Low sales, high launch/promotion cost, often loss-making.

Build awareness; skimming or penetration pricing; heavy promotion.

Growth

Sales rise fast, product turns profitable, rivals enter.

Widen distribution; build the brand; may cut price to win share.

Maturity

Sales peak then plateau; strong competition; highest profit.

Defend share; extension strategies; differentiate; efficiency.

Decline

Sales and profit fall as tastes/technology move on.

Harvest, reduce cost, or withdraw and replace.

Strategy

What it is

When to use it

Penetration

Deliberately LOW launch price to win market share fast.

New product entering a competitive/price-sensitive mass market.

Skimming

HIGH launch price to early adopters, later lowered.

Innovative/tech product with little competition (e.g. new smartphone).

Cost-plus (mark-up)

Add a fixed profit % to unit cost to set price.

Simple, safe method when costs are known and predictable.

Competitive

Price around rivals' prices (match or reference them).

Markets with strong, similar competitors; little differentiation.

Psychological

Prices that feel lower or signal value (e.g. $9.99; premium pricing to signal quality).

Consumer goods where perception drives buying.

Loss leader

Price a product below cost to draw customers who then buy other, profitable items.

Supermarkets/retail with wide ranges (e.g. cheap milk).

Price discrimination

Charge different prices to different groups/times for the same product.

Where markets can be separated (student fares, peak/off-peak).

Dynamic

Prices change in real time with demand, supply or data.

Airlines, ride-hailing, e-commerce, ticketing.

Channel

Route

Typical use

Direct (zero-intermediary)

Producer → consumer (own shop/website/factory outlet).

Full control and margin; e-commerce, D2C brands.

One-intermediary

Producer → retailer → consumer.

Consumer goods sold through shops.

Two-intermediary

Producer → wholesaler → retailer → consumer.

Where many small retailers buy in small quantities.

Agent/broker

Producer → agent → (retailer) → consumer.

Exports, insurance, property — agent has market access/expertise.

Above-the-line (ATL)

Below-the-line (BTL)

Definition

Paid promotion through mass, independent media the firm does not control.

Promotion the firm controls directly, often targeted.

Examples

TV, radio, cinema, print, billboards.

Sales promotions (discounts, BOGOF, loyalty schemes), direct mail, personal selling, sponsorship, PR, point-of-sale.

Best for

Building broad awareness for mass-market products.

Targeted, measurable response and building relationships.

Downside

Expensive; hard to measure; less targeted.

Limited reach; can feel intrusive; some erode margins.

P (HL)

What it means

Coherence example (a premium spa)

Inconsistency that breaks it

People

The staff who deliver and represent the service — their skill, attitude, training and appearance. In services the staff ARE the product.

Highly trained, warm, expert therapists.

Rude or untrained staff on premium prices.

Process

The systems and procedures that deliver the service — booking, waiting time, ordering, after-sales, consistency.

Smooth online booking, no waiting, a seamless experience.

Long queues and clumsy booking for a "luxury" service.

Physical evidence

The tangible cues that make an intangible service credible — premises, décor, uniforms, packaging, ambience, website look.

Elegant interiors, plush robes, calming design.

A shabby, cheap-looking reception charging premium prices.

Because a spa is a SERVICE — intangible, perishable and delivered by staff — WellNest must design all seven Ps to reinforce a premium positioning.

Product: a range of high-quality, distinctive treatments and a strong, calming brand. Price: premium pricing (or cost-plus with a high mark-up) that signals quality and matches the positioning — a low price would undermine credibility. Place: a prestige location and controlled booking through its own site, not mass discount vouchers. Promotion: aspirational, image-led marketing and PR, with minimal discounting that would cheapen the brand.

The three HL Ps are decisive for a spa. People: highly trained, warm, professional therapists — in a service the staff ARE the product, so recruitment and training are marketing decisions. Process: a seamless, unhurried experience — easy booking, no waiting, personalised consultations — signalling exclusivity. Physical evidence: elegant interiors, plush robes, calming ambience and quality packaging that make the intangible service tangible and justify the premium price.

The main risk to consistency is that services are VARIABLE: quality depends on individual staff on the day, so one rude therapist (People) or a long wait and clumsy booking (Process) can shatter the premium experience even if every other P is perfect. WellNest must therefore standardise its process, invest heavily in training and monitor service quality. Recommendation: adopt this coherent premium seven-P mix, prioritising People and Process because they are the hardest to control yet the ones that most determine whether customers feel the premium price is justified. Consistency, not any single luxurious touch, is what sustains the positioning.

The seven Ps of the marketing mix

Detailed Study Notes

At a glance

What you’ll learn

What the marketing mix is — and why coherence matters

Product: the product life cycle, extension and portfolio

Price: strategies and the numbers

Place and Promotion: getting it there and getting it noticed

HL only: People, Process and Physical evidence (services marketing)

Quick recap

Memorise this

How it’s examined

Take this whole topic with you

1Naming the four Ps in context

2Ordering the product life cycle

3Cost-plus (mark-up) price calculation

4Penetration vs skimming

5Choosing a distribution channel

6ATL vs BTL promotion

7Extension strategies for a maturing product

8Spot the inconsistent mix

9HL — the seven-P mix for a service

Cost-plus (mark-up) pricing

Profit mark-up %

Marketing mix

Coherent (consistent) marketing mix

Product life cycle (PLC)

Extension strategy

Branding

Penetration pricing

Price skimming

Cost-plus (mark-up) pricing

Loss leader

Price discrimination

Dynamic pricing

Distribution channel (Place)

Above-the-line (ATL) promotion

Below-the-line (BTL) promotion

People, Process, Physical evidence (HL)

✕Describing the four (or seven) Ps as separate, unconnected paragraphs instead of an integrated, coherent mix.

✕Confusing penetration pricing with price skimming.

✕Treating the product life cycle as a fixed, inevitable shape and claiming decline is unavoidable.

✕Mislabelling above-the-line and below-the-line promotion (e.g. calling a shop discount 'ATL').

✕In a pricing calculation, adding the mark-up % to the PRICE instead of the COST, or confusing mark-up with profit margin.

✕Ignoring the HL extension (People, Process, Physical evidence) when the case is a SERVICE, or forcing all seven Ps onto a physical good.

The seven Ps of the marketing mix

Detailed Study Notes

At a glance

What you’ll learn

What the marketing mix is — and why coherence matters

Product: the product life cycle, extension and portfolio

Price: strategies and the numbers

Place and Promotion: getting it there and getting it noticed

HL only: People, Process and Physical evidence (services marketing)

Quick recap

Memorise this

How it’s examined

Take this whole topic with you

1Naming the four Ps in context

2Ordering the product life cycle

3Cost-plus (mark-up) price calculation

4Penetration vs skimming

5Choosing a distribution channel

6ATL vs BTL promotion

7Extension strategies for a maturing product

8Spot the inconsistent mix

9HL — the seven-P mix for a service

Cost-plus (mark-up) pricing

Profit mark-up %