Magnification vs resolution — the two ideas students conflate
Magnification makes the image bigger. Resolution decides how much detail is in that bigger image.
Magnification is simply how many times larger the image is than the real object. It is a dimensionless ratio calculated from
where is the image size (measured from the photograph or drawing) and is the actual size of the specimen. You can magnify any image arbitrarily by photographing it or zooming in on a screen.
Resolution, by contrast, is the minimum distance between two points at which they can still be told apart. Below the resolution limit, two distinct points merge into a single blur and no amount of further magnification can recover the information. Resolution is set by the wavelength of the radiation used to form the image: the minimum resolvable distance is approximately .
Visible light has wavelengths of about 400–700 nm, so a light microscope cannot resolve detail finer than approximately 200 nm — about the diameter of a small mitochondrion. Pushing the magnification past ×1500 produces an image that is larger and blurrier but no more detailed — a phenomenon called empty magnification.
To see finer structures the radiation has to have a shorter wavelength. Accelerated electrons have a de Broglie wavelength of approximately 0.005 nm, which (after lens-aberration limits are accounted for) allows the transmission electron microscope to resolve detail down to about 0.5 nm — fine enough to see individual ribosomes and the bilayer of a membrane.
- Magnification = ratio (no units).
- Resolution = — limited by wavelength.
- Light: 200 nm. TEM: 0.5 nm. SEM: 3–10 nm.
- Empty magnification = beyond resolution = bigger + blurrier.
See the full worked example for the microscope in cell studies →