Countries manage energy sustainably by increasing supply from renewables, conserving energy, and using a balanced mix of sources — but each strategy has limits.
Switching to renewables — detailed specific example: Costa Rica. Costa Rica generates around 98–99% of its electricity from renewable sources, chiefly hydroelectric power, backed by geothermal and wind. This greatly cuts CO₂ emissions and reliance on imported fossil fuels, showing that a near-renewable grid is achievable. Assessment: it is highly effective for Costa Rica because the country has abundant rivers and volcanoes, but it depends heavily on hydro, which can fail in droughts — so it is not easily copied by countries without those resources.
Energy conservation and efficiency. Insulation, LED lighting, efficient appliances and better public transport cut demand cheaply, so less energy must be generated at all. Assessment: very cost-effective and applicable everywhere, but it relies on behaviour change and investment, and on its own it slows growth in demand rather than replacing dirty supply.
A balanced energy mix. Keeping nuclear as low-carbon baseload, plus storage (batteries) and smart grids, manages the intermittency of solar and wind. Assessment: this improves reliability, but nuclear creates long-lived radioactive waste and storage is still expensive.
Judgement. No single strategy is sufficient. Switching to renewables is the most important long-term measure and works impressively where conditions allow, as Costa Rica shows, but it is most sustainable when combined with conservation and a balanced, well-managed mix. Overall, the strategies are effective together, and their success depends strongly on a country's resources, wealth and political commitment.