Primary vs secondary research
First-hand vs existing data — different costs, different quality.
Primary research. Data collected FIRST-HAND for the firm's specific question.
Methods:
- Questionnaires (paper, online, phone).
- Interviews (one-to-one, structured or unstructured).
- Focus groups (8-10 people discussing under a moderator).
- Observation (watching customers without questioning).
- Test marketing (limited launch in a small area).
Pros: tailored to the question; up-to-date; competitors don't have it. Cons: expensive; slow; needs expertise to design well.
Secondary research. Using EXISTING data already collected by others.
Sources:
- Government statistics.
- Market reports (commercial research firms).
- Competitor websites and annual reports.
- Trade publications and industry associations.
- Internal sales records, customer databases.
Pros: cheap; fast; broad coverage. Cons: may be outdated, generic, biased toward whoever published it.
Best practice. Start with secondary to set context. Use primary to fill specific gaps.
Cambridge tip. Mark scheme expects students to know AT LEAST 3 primary methods AND 3 secondary sources.
- Primary: first-hand, expensive, specific.
- Secondary: existing, cheap, may be outdated.
- Use both together.