Detailed notes on Organisms and their Environment for Cambridge IGCSE Biology, covering key concepts, explanations, examples, and exam-focused revision points.
Many chains overlap: each organism may be eaten by — and eat — several others.
Reading a food web:
Each ARROW = one feeding relationship.
An organism with MANY arrows IN = predated by many.
An organism with MANY arrows OUT = eats many things.
Why webs matter:
Food webs are MORE STABLE than single chains.
If one species disappears, predators have alternatives.
A pure single-chain ecosystem is fragile.
Worked qualitative. Why do islands often have simpler ecosystems and more vulnerable species?
Islands are isolated → fewer species reach them.
Simpler food webs.
Each species more critical.
Removing one species (e.g. via introduction of rats) can collapse the whole web.
Why island species (dodo, etc.) have gone extinct so often.
Cambridge tip. When given a food web, count arrows IN and OUT to identify predators and prey.
Network of food chains.
Arrows = feeding relationships.
More realistic than chains.
Webs more resilient.
What happens when you disturb a food web
▼
Remove a species → ripple effects through the whole web.
Direct effects.
The species' PREDATORS lose a food source.
The species' PREY lose a predator → population may grow.
Indirect effects (cascade).
Increased prey may eat more of THEIR food → that population shrinks.
Predators that lost the species may shift to other prey → those populations decrease.
Eventually new equilibrium reached.
Worked qualitative. In Yellowstone, wolves were exterminated by 1920 then reintroduced in 1995. What happened?
Without wolves: ELK populations EXPLODED.
Elk overgrazed willow + aspen trees on river banks.
Trees disappeared → riverbanks eroded → rivers changed course.
Beavers (need willows) declined → fewer wetlands.
Songbirds, fish, insects all affected.
After wolf reintroduction:
Elk populations REDUCED.
Trees REGREW along rivers.
Beavers RETURNED.
The whole ecosystem partially RESTORED.
A famous example of TROPHIC CASCADE.
Removing one top predator ripples down through several trophic levels — a trophic cascade.
The lesson. Top predators often have outsized effects on entire ecosystems. Removing them can collapse the system.
Cambridge tip. When asked predict effects of removing a species, trace at LEAST TWO levels of consequences (direct + indirect). Cambridge marks this depth.
Direct: predators lose food, prey grow.
Indirect: cascade through web.
Yellowstone wolves: classic case.
Top predators have outsized effects.
Quick recap
Food chain: linear; arrows from food to eater.
Food web: network of chains.
Webs more realistic + resilient.
Removing species → ripple effects.
Yellowstone wolves: real cascade example.
Memorise this
Verbatim phrases and definitions Cambridge mark schemes credit.
Food chain — linear sequence of feeding.
Food web — network of food chains.
Trophic level — position in chain.
Arrows show ENERGY FLOW (food to eater).
How it’s examined
Food chains/webs appear Paper 4 (5-7 marks: construct, label, predict effects). Examiner reports flag students drawing arrows the wrong way and missing cascade effects.
Arrows point from the organism eaten to the organism that eats it (the direction of energy flow), NOT the other way.
2Identify the organisms in a food chain
Getting started• food chain, identify
▼
Question
In the food chain algae → small fish → large fish → heron, name (a) the producer, (b) a primary consumer and (c) a tertiary consumer.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1
(a) The producer is the algae (it photosynthesises).
Step 2
(b) The primary consumer is the small fish (it eats the producer).
Step 3
(c) The tertiary consumer is the heron (it is the fourth organism, eating the large fish).
Answer
(a) Algae; (b) small fish; (c) heron.
Examiner tip
Count along the chain: producer, primary consumer, secondary consumer, tertiary consumer.
3Food web versus food chain
Building confidence• Adapted from 0610/42 May/Jun 2024 Q23• food web
▼
Question
Explain the difference between a food chain and a food web.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1
A food chain shows a single line of feeding relationships — one organism eating the next.
Step 2
A food web is a network of interconnected food chains in an ecosystem.
Step 3
A food web shows that most organisms eat — and are eaten by — more than one species.
Step 4
So a food web is more realistic; a food chain is a simplified part of it.
Answer
A food chain is a single line of who-eats-whom; a food web is a network of interlinked food chains, showing that most organisms have several food sources and predators.
4Pyramid of numbers
Building confidence• pyramid of numbers
▼
Question
Explain why a pyramid of numbers is sometimes inverted, using the food chain oak tree → caterpillars → birds.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1
A pyramid of numbers shows the number of organisms at each trophic level.
Step 2
Here, there is only one large oak tree (the producer), but it feeds many caterpillars (primary consumers).
Step 3
So the producer bar (1 tree) is narrower than the primary consumer bar (many caterpillars), making the pyramid look inverted at the bottom.
Step 4
This happens because pyramids of numbers do not take size into account — one big tree provides food for many small animals.
Answer
A single large producer (one oak tree) can feed many small consumers (caterpillars), so the producer bar is narrower than the bar above it and the pyramid of numbers is inverted.
Examiner tip
Pyramids of numbers ignore size, so they can be inverted. A pyramid of biomass or energy is always upright.
5Removing a species from a food web
Stretch• ecological disturbance
▼
Question
In a food web, foxes eat rabbits, and rabbits eat grass. Explain what is likely to happen to the rabbit and grass populations if all the foxes are removed.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1
With the foxes (a predator) removed, fewer rabbits are eaten.
Step 2
So the rabbit population increases.
Step 3
The larger number of rabbits eats more grass, so the grass population decreases.
Step 4
Eventually, if the grass becomes scarce, there is not enough food for all the rabbits, so the rabbit population may fall again, until a new balance is reached.
Answer
Removing the foxes lets the rabbit population rise (fewer eaten); the extra rabbits eat more grass, so the grass falls; eventually a shortage of grass limits the rabbits again.
Examiner tip
Trace the knock-on effects: removing a predator → prey increases → its food decreases → prey may then fall.
6Interpret a food web
Stretch• food web, data
▼
Question
In a food web, owls eat both mice and small birds; mice and small birds both eat seeds. A disease kills most of the mice. Suggest and explain what happens to the small birds.
Step-by-step solution
Step 1
With most of the mice gone, the owls have less food, so they will eat more small birds instead.
Step 2
This increased predation tends to reduce the number of small birds.
Step 3
However, with fewer mice, there is less competition for seeds, so more food (seeds) is available to the small birds.
Step 4
So there are two opposing effects — more predation but more food — and the actual change in the small bird population depends on which effect is stronger.
Answer
Owls eat more small birds (less other prey), which reduces them; but with fewer mice there is less competition for seeds, which helps them. The result depends on which effect is greater.
Examiner tip
A good food-web answer considers BOTH the predator effect and the competition effect, rather than assuming a single outcome.
Model Answers — Food Chains and Food Webs
High-scoring sample answers for food chains and food webs on the Cambridge IGCSE 0610 paper, with examiner-style notes mapping each response to the mark scheme and assessment objectives.
Question 1
Paper 4 short-answer style1 mark
State what the arrows in a food chain represent. (1 mark)
Model answer
The arrows represent the direction of energy flow (from the organism eaten to the organism that eats it).
Why this scores
One mark for 'direction of energy flow / the flow of energy'.
Question 2
Paper 4 short-answer style2 marks
In the food chain lettuce → slug → frog → snake, name the producer and the secondary consumer. (2 marks)
Model answer
The producer is the lettuce; the secondary consumer is the frog.
Why this scores
One mark each: lettuce (producer); frog (secondary consumer / third organism).
Question 3
Paper 4 structured style3 marks
Explain the difference between a food chain and a food web. (3 marks)
Model answer
A food chain shows a single sequence of organisms, each feeding on the one before it. A food web is a network of many interconnected food chains in an ecosystem. A food web shows that most organisms feed on, and are eaten by, more than one type of organism, so it is a more realistic picture of feeding relationships.
Why this scores
Three marks: food chain = single line; food web = network of interlinked chains; web shows organisms with several food sources/predators.
Question 4
Paper 4 (Extended) structured style4 marks
Explain why a pyramid of numbers for the food chain oak tree → caterpillars → birds is inverted at the bottom. (4 marks)
Model answer
A pyramid of numbers shows the number of organisms at each trophic level. In this food chain there is only one large oak tree acting as the producer, but it provides food for many caterpillars. So the bar for the producer (1 tree) is narrower than the bar for the primary consumers (many caterpillars), which makes the pyramid inverted at the base. This happens because a pyramid of numbers does not take the size of the organisms into account — one very large producer can feed a great many small consumers.
Why this scores
Four marks: pyramid shows numbers; one large producer feeds many consumers; producer bar narrower than the one above; numbers ignore size of organisms.
Question 5
Paper 4 (Extended) structured style5 marks
In a food web, hawks eat snakes, and snakes eat mice. Predict and explain what would happen to the snake and mouse populations if all the hawks were removed. (5 marks)
Model answer
If the hawks (the snakes' predator) are removed, fewer snakes are eaten, so the snake population increases. With more snakes present, more mice are eaten, so the mouse population decreases. As the mice become scarce, there is less food for the snakes, so eventually the snake population may fall again, and the populations settle towards a new balance. So removing the hawks first increases the snakes and decreases the mice, with knock-on effects until a new equilibrium is reached.
Why this scores
Five marks: hawks removed → fewer snakes eaten → snakes increase; more snakes → more mice eaten → mice decrease; mice scarce → less food for snakes → snakes may fall / new balance.
Question 6
Paper 4 (Extended) extended-response style6 marks
In a food web, foxes eat both rabbits and voles; rabbits and voles both eat grass. A new disease greatly reduces the rabbit population. Discuss the effects this could have on the rest of the food web. (6 marks)
Model answer
If the disease greatly reduces the rabbit population, the foxes lose one of their main food sources, so they will tend to eat more voles instead. This increased predation could reduce the vole population. However, with fewer rabbits eating the grass, there is now less competition for grass, so more grass is available to the voles, which could allow the vole population to increase. The actual effect on the voles depends on whether the increased predation by foxes or the reduced competition for food has the greater effect. The grass population is likely to increase at first, because there are fewer rabbits eating it. If the foxes cannot find enough food overall (fewer rabbits, and only so many voles), the fox population may also fall. This shows how a change to one species in a food web can have knock-on effects on several others, through both feeding relationships and competition.
Why this scores
Up to 6 marks: foxes eat more voles (predation) → voles may fall; fewer rabbits → less competition for grass → voles may rise; the net effect depends on which is greater; grass increases; foxes may decline if food is short; overall knock-on effects through the web.
Key Definitions and Keywords — Food Chains and Food Webs
Definitions to memorise and the exact keywords mark schemes credit for food chains and food webs answers — sharpened from recent examiner reports for the 2026 0610 sitting.
Food chain
Examiner keyword▼
A diagram showing the flow of energy from one organism to the next, beginning with a producer.
Food web
Examiner keyword▼
A network of interconnected food chains, showing all the feeding relationships in an ecosystem.
Pyramid of numbers
Examiner keyword▼
A diagram showing the number of organisms at each trophic level. Can be inverted, because it ignores the size of the organisms.
Trophic level
▼
A feeding position in a food chain: producers are level 1, primary consumers level 2, and so on.
Common Mistakes and Misconceptions — Food Chains and Food Webs
The traps other students keep falling into on food chains and food webs questions — taken from recent Cambridge IGCSE 0610 examiner reports and mark schemes — and how to avoid them.
✕Drawing the arrows from the eater to the food.
▼
Why it happens
It sounds like 'the fox eats the rabbit'.
How to avoid it
Arrows show the flow of ENERGY, from the food to the feeder: grass → rabbit means the rabbit eats the grass.
✕Saying that removing one species has no effect on the others.
▼
Why it happens
The web seems robust.
How to avoid it
Food webs are interconnected, so removing one species has knock-on effects: its predators lose food, and its prey may increase.
✕Saying a pyramid of numbers must always be upright.
▼
Why it happens
Students confuse it with a pyramid of energy.
How to avoid it
A pyramid of numbers CAN be inverted (e.g. one tree feeding many insects). A pyramid of energy is always upright.
Food Chains and Food Webs — frequently asked questions
The things students keep getting wrong in this sub-topic, answered.